24-Oct to 02-Nov
Verdict
Building entirely different teams for different formats of the game is not a feasible option. Each match is different with its own set of challenges, players learn different things. So instead of a few players exposed to every situation and adept at handling them, you get a lot of players who have just one dimension to their game which may or may not help them have a long career. Good players will do well regardless of format, let\\\'s not take away their chance to do that.
12.5 %
Defend
87.5 %
Attack
“ A good idea that could be revolutionary. ”
“ An idea that will help opponents more than it will help the team ”
Monish Moorthy: Given the trouble of over-scheduling and distributing opportunities of exposure between young talent, developing specialized teams could be a good idea. Teams can have larger pools of reserves in this case, each completely dependable for the given conditions and with their responsibilities and roles clear.
Foram Gosrani: If we have different teams: A player will know how to play only in one condition. While he may become a specialist in that condition, opponents will be one step ahead and plan the ways to get him out.
For
0 Opinions
Against
6 Opinions
by building diffrent teams for diffrent
conditions,it can never be a team full of unity which can lead to many loses.....
27 Oct 2011
Also, while we prepare a player to play in just 1 condition, he will not become a "fully qualified" cricketer; which means we will have to create a bigger pool to select players from. This segregates the talent and does not do justice to players who can play in all conditions.
24 Oct 2011
Suggest a topic
Drop in your suggestion for the next debate
Archives