nope. i only claim i m truthful. others r false or not depends upon coment to coment. neither did i anytime claim i have best knowledge or it shud be agreed everywhere. u assuming on ur own as usual what i think. i m not a cricket historian either. i only know this decade of cricket well. n only read certain things about past. i dont think i even dedicate 1% of my daily time in cricket. its not a question of how much total cricket knowledge i have. whatever i know, i make sure i know well, n debate about it. if u cant beat me in dravid-sachin-sehwag arguments, then beating me in gavaskar-mankad argument or any other numerous debates isnt going to prove me lesser to u in that dravid-sachin-sehwag argument. ur going out of context…
|
The statistic of victories ...Dravid’s role |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|

